Search This Blog

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Movie Review #2: Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) Review
--The Sci-Fi Guy

Disclaimer: My reviews will contain many spoilers (and, as a result, this disclaimer). So if you don't wish to be spoiled, be sure and watch the movie before reading my review.

It's really no secret that I'm a huge Trekkie. Unless you don't know me, in which case don't mind the empty bag and the feline happily prancing around. I fell in love with Star Trek during The Next Generation, their sixth season. I saw my first episode, loved it, and was hooked ever since. Being that I was born in the early 80's, I really didn't grow up with the original Star Trek series. So this review is from the eyes of a relative newcomer to the franchise, albeit one that's been with the franchise for about seventeen years now. Let me briefly set the stage for you.

The original Star Trek series aired for three seasons, from 1966 to 1969. Although the show was canceled (twice -- it was revived after fans wrote in and saved the show when it was canceled after its second season), it still had a very strong cult following. After a few years off the air, an animated series was developed and ran for two seasons, 1973-1974. Then a new television series, titled Star Trek: Phase II, was being developed but would be canceled before seeing the light of day when Paramount's Television Service folded.

So after the success of movies such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Star Wars (movies which I'll most likely review at some point), and after having been off the air (or in syndication, but no new episodes being produced) for five years, fans finally got what they had been waiting for. A brand-spanking-new Star Trek adventure, and one on the big screen, at that. Would it live up to fans' expectations?.....the short answer is no. But they were happy to have new Trek, and it's still a good movie on its own. For the long answer, read on.



Plot

Since Star Trek: Phase II had been canceled, the writers actually rushed to turn the pilot episode (titled "In Thy Image") into a feature film. (Other scripts written for Star Trek: Phase II made their way into episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation.) This is where many people, fans and non-fans alike, really feel that the film falls flat. Now don't get me wrong. At its heart is a very Star Trek story. But it feels like a rehash of certain episodes of Star Trek ("The Changeling," in particular). There are spoilers ahead.

Earth finds itself threatened by a large entity that calls itself V'ger. On its way to Earth it wreaks havoc in its path, decimating three Klingon Birds-of Prey and a Federation starbase, amongst other things. The Enterprise, now under the command of Captain Willard Decker, is ordered to intercept this new threat. Being the only ship in range (how many times have we heard that one before?), the ship is ordered to launch ahead of schedule and to rush finishing the refit. James Kirk (now promoted to admiral), convinces Starfleet brass to give him command of the Enterprise for this mission. Kirk, subsequently, convinces Starfleet to "draft" Dr. McCoy, and Spock (who has been on Vulcan going through the Kohlinahr ritual to purge himself of all remaining emotions) meets the ship en route to V'ger.

That's basically the whole gist of the movie. While it's not the most in-depth plot, there are some very stunning visual effects (and I would recommend you get The Director's Edition, which has been remastered and the special effects look even more impressive). While the effects are archaic by today's standards, they were way ahead of the time for 1979. Star Trek has always been known for pushing the boundaries of special effects, among other boundaries. So there are some pretty slow sections during the course of the film that's basically there to simply show off the impressive special effects. There's a slow trip around the Enterprise by Scotty and Kirk, which I'm pretty sure was also kind of a nod to the fans. Kind of a "welcome back," if you will. Then there are some parts of the movie while the ship is inside V'ger that takes a while to get through, but again the effects look great.

In the course of the film the crew makes a startling discovery. V'ger is actually the Voyager 6 probe, a fictional member of the Voyager series which were sent to explore the farthest reaches of the solar system and beyond. Voyager 6 was pulled into a black hole and presumed lost, but as the crew have now discovered it emerged somewhere on the far side of the galaxy and encountered a race of living machines. They discovered Voyager 6 had a mission, to learn all that was knowable and return the information to its creator. The living machines constructed a spacecraft for the probe and sent it back to Earth. On the way, the probe had amassed so much knowledge that it had attained sentience. Finally on the verge of completing its mission, it gives Earth an ultimatum: bring the creator to V'ger so that V'ger and its creator can "merge," or it will destroy all carbon-based life on the planet.

The film is short on action, and is very cerebral. It almost reminds me of the first pilot episode, "The Cage." That episode was deemed "too cerebral," but Gene Roddenberry was given the rare opportunity of filming another pilot for the series. In the same vein, this movie was almost the "pilot episode" of the films, and just like "The Cage" was too cerebral for the tastes of the fans spawning another pilot, the next movie was filmed much heavier on action. They wanted what they had come to know from Star Trek: an intelligent story with plenty of action.

Soundtrack

The soundtrack was composed by the late Jerry Goldsmith (1929-2004), who composed much of the music for the Star Trek films, and some of the music for the series'. He was an accomplished composer and aside from Star Trek, composed music for a plethora of other films and television shows. The opening theme for Star Trek: The Motion Picture would later be re-used for Star Trek: The Next Generation.

One thing in particular I noticed about the music Mr. Goldsmith composed is that it's completely natural for the events transpiring in the movie. Oftentimes, I'd be watching the movie completely unaware of the soundtrack as if it's just supposed to be there. It would have been noticeable had it not been there. Everything from the triumphant re-introduction of the Starship Enterprise to building up the suspense upon entry of V'ger, and traveling further inside the living machine. If you feel the movie drags on a bit in places, just sit back and enjoy the wonderful orchestral soundtrack.

Ethics

There are a few themes running through this film. One is Kirk's obsession with the Enterprise. He let himself get promoted to admiral (a fact he would later bemoan to Picard in Star Trek: Generations). Yet he can't let it go that someone else is commanding his beloved ship. He once told Decker that he hopes he has the opportunity to command another ship someday. McCoy points out to Kirk that he's obsessed with the Enterprise, and that he went to a lot of trouble to get her back. However, there's no real resolution to this problem because his obsession actually works out in the end. Decker takes the place of V'ger's creator and "melds" with it, thereby leaving the ship without a captain. Kirk is all too happy to take over.

Another theme turns up in a few places in Star Trek. V'ger and its probe keep saying that the crew and other carbon-based lifeforms are "not true lifeforms." This seems to be a clever juxtaposition of humans who misunderstand androids. Data has to convince a Federation jury that he's sentient in "The Measure of a Man" (TNG). But in this case, rather than deciding the fate of an android, it's mechanical lifeforms who disregard carbon-based lifeforms (i.e. humans) as not truly alive. This is a great way to foster understanding of this dilemma, especially to those of us who have never had to go through it. Kirk and Decker finally convince V'ger that carbon-based lifeforms are true lifeforms by showing V'ger that its creator was, in fact, a carbon-based lifeform.

Finally, V'ger has a crisis of identity. V'ger, upon its return to Earth, has a very important question for its creator. "Is this all there is?" Not necessarily what its purpose in life is, because it knows its purpose and has, in fact, fulfilled it. But what else is there? Even Spock mentions that we, as humanoid lifeforms, can see beyond the physical realm and can make leaps of faith that can't be proven logically. V'ger has to join with its creator to have a new purpose for existing.

Characters

While the original series had six main characters in season one, and seven in seasons two and three, three characters have always been at the forefront of the show: James Kirk (played by William Shatner), Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy), and Leonard McCoy (played by the late DeForest Kelley). One reason this film suffers is because the trio isn't even together again until a good way into the movie. This is necessary, of course, because after being off the air for five years they had to find a way to bring the crew back together. But even while together, there was really none of the chemistry of the three from the series. Spock and McCoy didn't verbally spar with each other. Now granted, this could probably be explained away by the gravity of the situation, but that's just it. There's very little humor in the film to get us through the heaviness of it.

The other supporting characters are there: Nyota Uhura (played by Nichelle Nichols), Hikaru Sulu (played by George Takei), Montgomery Scott (played by the late James Doohan), and Pavel Chekov (played by Walter Koenig). The problem here is there's absolutely no character development for any of them. They're all there on the Enterprise from the start, so apparently they've all stayed with the ship for the past five years. All of their dialog is geared towards being supporting characters.

There's also Captain Willard Decker (played by Stephen Collins, known for playing Eric Camden in 7th Heaven -- and for trivia buffs, Catherine Hicks, who plays his wife Annie Camden, starred in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home as Dr. Gillian Taylor), and Lieutenant Ilia (played by Persis Khambatta). Little to nothing is revealed about these characters other than the fact that Decker was once stationed on the Deltan homeworld and knew Ilia, and that Ilia's vow of celibacy is on file. While her vow of celibacy is never expanded upon, various deleted scenes make reference to it. Keeping this to a family-friendly review, I won't expound on exactly why Deltans in Starfleet are required to take an oath of celibacy, but if you're really that curious about it the information isn't that hard to find.

Overview

So those are the high points of Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Again, it was the movie the fans were waiting for but not necessarily the one they wanted. The Powers-That-Be would greatly make up for it with the sequel, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, which is largely hailed as one of the greatest movie sequels ever (which are usually worse than the original). However, I can't help but wonder if Star Trek II is hailed as such a great sequel because Star Trek: The Motion Picture is seen as such a lackluster movie. Sequels tend to be worse than the original because they have a hard act to follow. That wasn't the case here. And it's unfortunate, because the movie was actually rushed to be finished and meet its deadline. Also, the director, Robert Wise, was never satisfied with the final product. Thankfully, they churned out a great sequel, which I'll review next.

So again, the movie's not terrible. I wouldn't even call it bad. There are some great things about Star Trek: The Motion Picture. As I noted earlier, I'd recommend finding The Director's Edition. And join me as I review the rest of the movies in the Star Trek saga, and then branch out to other science fiction movies, classic and modern. I'll try to church out the Star Trek reviews as quickly as possible, but then I'll probably limit my reviews to once a week. The greatest thing about science fiction is not just the storytelling and how it gets our imagination going, but the very fact that it can teach us something about ourselves. Let's continue on...for the human adventure is just beginning.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Out of the mouths of babes...

This is a brief devotional I wrote and submitted for consideration to be placed at the following blog: http://journeydeeperin2godsword.wordpress.com/ . Go check it out, if you'd like. There are a lot of great devotionals there. I also wanted to post this here, in the hopes that it may encourage someone.

“Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying: ‘Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you; Before you were born, I sanctified you; I ordained you a prophet to the nations.’ Then said I: ‘Ah, Lord God! Behold, I cannot speak, for I am a youth.’ But the Lord said to me, ‘Do not say, “I am a youth,” for you shall go to all whom I send you and whatever I command you, you shall speak. Do not be afraid of their faces, for I am with you to deliver you,’ says the Lord.” -- Jeremiah 1:4-8 (NKJV)

As the old saying goes: the more things change, the more things stay the same. Do you ever read through the Scriptures and realize that even though we’re living a couple thousand years after these prophets, we’re still plagued with the same problems and many of the cultural biases are still present today? Many young people today remain silent when they should speak up, because adults appear to think that children are to be seen and not heard. But God has a difference of opinion here.

He chose Jeremiah before He even formed the prophet in his mother’s womb. He ordained Jeremiah to be a prophet and called on him when he was still a youth. Jeremiah had the same issues: “I am but a child. I can’t speak up to my elders.” God’s response to this is: “Don’t be afraid. I will give you the words to speak, and I will be with you.” The Apostle Paul had similar words for Timothy: “Let no one despise your youth, but be an example to the believers in word, in conduct, in love, in spirit, in faith, in purity.” (1 Timothy 4:12). Jesus Himself even told his disciples: “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of Heaven” (Matthew 19:14).

There’s a special place in the heart of our Lord for children. While we should always strive to respect our elders, sometimes it’s up to the youth to be an example of Godly living.

Whether young or old, strive to be an example of Godly love, faith, and purity.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Album Review: Hell is for Wimps -- The Newsboys

The Newsboys
Hell is for Wimps
1990 (StarSong)

Line-up: Sean Taylor (bass), John James (lead vocals), Peter Furler (drums and vocals), Jonathan Geange (guitar)

Hell is for Wimps is the second studio album by The Newsboys. It's basically a follow-up album to Read All About It, continuing in the same musical vein. Phil Yates had left the band and was replaced by Jonathan Geange on guitar. It consists of ten songs (which will actually pretty much be the standard number of songs for a Newsboys album, with a few variations and special editions).

Stand Up for Jesus
Written by: Peter Furler, Philip Urry

The album starts out with an upbeat rocker. A pretty straightforward song about being bold in your witness for Jesus. But again, the songwriting on this album is definitely not up to Newsboys standards, and the type of one rhyming couplet in this song would later be condemned in their DeGarmo & Key cover, Boycott Hell.

In the End
Written by: Peter Hook, Bernard Sumner, Ian Kevin Curtis, Stephen Morris

For this next song (which rocks pretty hard), they tackle humanism and evolution. In the End was inspired by the verse in Scripture which mentions that there will come a time when every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord. The song itself rocks pretty hard, and there are times in the song where John James reminds me a bit of Greg X. Volz (of Petra) -- in fact, the whole song sounds quite Petra-esque.

Simple Man
Written by: Peter Hook, Bernard Sumner, Ian Kevin Curtis, Stephen Morris

I think this is one of their stronger songs, lyrically, from this album. It's a song about living a simple life, devoid of riches that could corrupt you.

All I Can See
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

This is a worship song. It has a bit of an 80's flair to it, as do the rest of the songs.

Ten Thousand Miles
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

This is a song about the lengths one will go to show their devotion for God. While it seems the claims may be a bit exaggerated (walking ten thousand miles and dying for God, which one never really knows if they would do that until faced with the situation), it all culminates with the concession that it's God who gives us the strength in the first place to be able to do great things for Him, even, if need be, to die for Him.

Something's Missing
Written by: Paul Evan Colman, Peter Andrew Furler

This is a song about how a life without Jesus is missing something. This is a pretty common theme among Christian songs, so this isn't a terribly original song.

Get Up for Love
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

Here we have a song that talks about a believer who basically lives in secret, and poses questions such as will you let your unbelieving friends go to Hell by not ministering to them?

Sea of Love
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

Now we have a love song, expressing his love for a woman with Godly love. A love like this truly lasts forever, unlike the love expressed by the average hair metal band.

Love You Tomorrow
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

Now this one switches gears slightly, and instead of a love song for a woman is a love song to God. It's a slow ballad, a song about how our love should grow ever stronger for God.

Victory
Written by: Peter Furler, Billy Smiley, Sean Taylor, John James

Finally, we end on a praise song about our victory that we have through Jesus. The verses are a mesh of different paraphrased verses from the Bible.

Closing thoughts: Again, nothing much new from the first album (basically a follow-up). There are some gems on this album, at least from a nostalgic perspective. The album's not horrible, just not up to modern Newsboys standards (or even their standards from the 90's). Again, if you're a Newsboys fan, this album is worth checking out. If you're new to the Newsboys, I'd recommend one of their later 90's albums to get yourself introduced to them.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Album Review: Read All About It -- The Newsboys

In honor of The Newsboys' recent release of their 14th studio album, Born Again, I have decided to do a full-fledged discography review of one of the most popular Christian pop-rock bands: The Newsboys. I didn't actually get into Christian music until 1999 (and it was dcTalk's Jesus Freak that drew me in). I really didn't know there was Christian rock music. Having grown up in the church, I thought Christian music was hymns and 80's worship writers like Michael W. Smith and Amy Grant. Boy, was I happy when I heard the news (pun definitely intended).

To give you a little background, the Newsboys officially formed in 1987 in West Orange, New Jersey, after signing with Refuge Communications. The boys hail from Australia, where they had formed a band named The News in Mooloolaba, Queensland. However, when they moved to the States,  they changed the name of the band to avoid confusion with the American band Huey Lewis and the News. The News' lineup consisted of John James (lead vocals), Sean Taylor (bass), Peter Furler (drums), and George Perdikis (guitar). The first album the Newsboys released under Refuge was Read All About It. George Perdikis had left the band (but can still be heard on a few tracks on the album), and was replaced by Phil Yates. So without further ado, here is the review for that album.

The Newsboys
Read All About It
1988 (Refuge)

Line-up: John James (lead vocals), Sean Taylor (bass), Peter Furler (drums), Phil Yates (guitar)

I'm actually pretty biased here. I was first introduced to The Newsboys pretty late into their career. So when I first heard their three albums (which, in fact, are albums that even the band would rather forget ever happened), I was pretty shocked. This was not the Newsboys I was used to. That's not to say they were bad, necessarily, just not up to The Newsboys' current standards. But of course, bands have to hit their stride. The Newsboys couldn't become The Newsboys overnight. One track even made it onto their first greatest hits album released in 2000. Theologian and music lover Mark Alan Powell calls the album  sing-along dance music. The album consists of ten songs.

I Got Your Number
Written by: John James, Sean Taylor, and Peter Furler

This song is simply about prayer. It's the only song from the Newsboys' first three albums to make it onto their 2000 greatest hits album. It's a pretty catchy song in its own right, but in all honesty not very interesting lyrically. Most of the lines that should rhyme, don't. The same word is used again (i.e. I got your number where love can be found/I got your number where truth can be found). The song does have a great bassline.

Listen for the Shout!
Written by: George Perdikis, Sean Taylor, John James, and Peter Furler

This one is about how Jesus will be returning. It reminds me a bit of a surf rock song. Another catchy one. This one has a bit more going for it, lyrically, but still nothing great. In a future song (Boycott Hell), the Newsboys mention "boycotting" dumb lyrics and how certain words shouldn't be used to rhyme with other words. Well, a good number of these songs were probably on their minds when they sang it.

Lighthouse
Written by: Sean Taylor, George Perdikis, Peter Furler

This song seems to be about someone saved by a street preacher. Another upbeat song, somewhere between Brian Setzer Orchestra and a lounge singer.

It's Joy
Written by: Sean Taylor, Peter Furler, John James

There's a lot of good to say about this one. The bass is catchy, there are some tasty organ licks, and the guitar solo is pretty nice. However, the lyrics, again (as is the case with most of their earlier albums) are not that great. Don't get me wrong, it's great to sing about the joy that God gives us. But the lyrics here are very simplistic (which isn't always a bad thing), and not up to the Newsboys' standards. They later released another song called Joy which speaks of the joy God gives us a little more creatively.

You're Still There
Written by: John James

A nice song about how God never leaves us. This one reminds me a lot of The Police. This is probably one of the stronger songs, lyrically speaking, on this album.

Read All About It
Written by: Peter Furler, George Perdikis, and John James

Another Police-esque song. This is another simple song about how you can find good news in the Bible as opposed to the bad news constantly springing up in the morning papers.

Hold on Tight
Written by: George Perdikis, Sean Taylor, and Peter Furler

This one actually rocks pretty hard. Opposite to the previous song, this one is encouraging us not to let go of God.

Never Surrender
Written by: George Perdikis, John James, and Peter Furler

This one had a lot of potential. It rarely ever rhymes, and one of the rhyming couplets is a bit awkward (You've got the power, don't be ashamed/You gotta stand up for the name of Jesus -- it could just as easily have been "You gotta stand up for Jesus' name," and it would have worked better as a rhyme). The pre-chorus and the chorus are fine, though, and the harmonies are nice.

The Big Time
Written by: Tommy Simms, George Perdikis, Sean Taylor, Peter Furler, and John James

This one is a paraphrase of Ecclesiastes 3, a little more upbeat than Turn! Turn! Turn! by The Byrds.

He's Coming Back
Written by: (Not listed in the insert)

Another upbeat song about Jesus' imminent return, and to be ready for it.

Closing thoughts: Honestly, I haven't listened to this album in quite a long time. Now upon listening to it again to write this review, it's really not as bad as I remembered it. I would still probably consider their first three albums their three worst, but if you're a Newsboys fan I would definitely say these albums are worth a listen. I don't have much to say about them because they're pretty straightforward. There are some major 80's influences in these songs (I can particularly hear The Police in a couple of their songs), but then again the album was released in 1988. So if you've never heard of the Newsboys, I'd say definitely start with one of their later albums (I'd probably recommend Not Ashamed, Going Public, or Take me to Your Leader). But if you are a Newsboys fan, you should at least check this one out.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Super Mario Brothers Crossover

I just want to briefly share with you a game I've come across. I've seen/read a couple different reviewers reviewing this game. It's called Super Mario Bros. Crossover, and it's a must-play for any fan of the original NES. It's the full game of Super Mario Bros. but with a twist. You can now play as seven different characters, with possibly more on the way. You can play through the game as Mario, Ryu Hyabusa (Ninja Gaiden), Mega Man, Link (The Legend of Zelda), Bill Rizer (Contra), Simon Belmont (Castlevania), or Samus Aran (Metroid). Add to that five difficulty levels and a number of other gems and you've got yourself a winner. Rather than tell you anything more about it, I'd urge you to go try it out for yourself: http://supermariobroscrossover.com/

Inflammatory Language

I have a new follower! Yay. Welcome, Flashman85. And to anyone reading, make sure you check his blog out.

I was recently pointed to a pro-choice article written by a girl who simply goes by ProChoiceGal. I did respond to her blog, hoping to start a dialog with her, but it seems she's not interested. Although I was very respectful toward her and the pro-choice movement, she chose not to post my note on her blog (she had her administration filter on). That being said, I will not be responding to her blog here because I doubt I'd have her permission to recreate it and I wouldn't want to reproduce it without her permission. But I did want to touch on one thing.

Her opening line: "Dear Anti-Choicers..." It doesn't get more inflammatory than this, people. Now, I can hold respectful discussions with people who believe contrary to me. But calling those against abortion "Anti-Choicers" is an obvious inflammatory term. It's what we call an "ad hominem" argument, lit. "to the man." This is a fallacy in which rather than responding to someone's argument, you attack them personally in order to make them seem as horrible as possible. "How can I agree with someone so despicable?" Those against abortion are no more "anti-choice" than those in favor of abortion are "anti-life." But how can she be expected to be taken seriously? If your position is strong, there is no need to attack the person who holds those beliefs.

Even Christians can fall into the hole of being complete jerks on-line. Internet anonymity is stronger than alcohol in releasing you from your inhibitions. Jesus wants us to love each other. There is no reason for anyone, especially Christians, to be jerks. Being mean and nasty will only cause the other person to become defensive, and they'll never admit you're correct even if you actually are.

The bottom line is: if you're going to be debating your beliefs, do so respectfully. After all, that's the only way to truly convince someone.